ABSTRACT
Background: The frst vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 was approved in December 2020. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV2 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated infammatory disease (IMID) have so far been evaluated in the 2-6 weeks following complete vaccination and risk groups for poor early vaccine response have been identifed leading to specifc vaccination recommendations. However, data on the long-term course and persistence of vaccine response in IMID patients, as well as the outcomes of the specifc recommendations are lacking. Objectives: To evaluate the long-term course of humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in a large prospective cohort of IMID patients and non-IMID controls with a follow-up duration of up-to to 10 months after the frst vaccine dose. Methods: We have initiated a prospective dynamic cohort of IMID patients and healthy controls in February 2020 to monitor immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory infections including COVID-19 (1). Participants who contributed data starting from the 4 weeks before their frst vaccination onwards were included in this analysis. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were quantifed with an ELISA from Euroimmun (Lübeck, Germany) with an optical density cutoff of 0.8. We ftted linear mixed-effect models for log-transformed antibody levels using time splines with adjustment for age and sex. Marginal mean antibody levels with 95% confdence intervals (CI) were estimated at selected time points for IMID patients and controls with double vaccination. We descriptively analyzed the observed antibody levels over time in cohort participants receiving two vaccinations vs. three vaccinations. Results: Among 5076 cohort participants, 3147 IMID patients and healthy controls (mean (SD) age 49 (16)) provided 4756 samples for this analysis between December 2020 and 2021, with a median (IQR) 28 (14-31) weeks of follow-up after the frst vaccination (Table 1). 2965 (94%) participants had received at least 2 and 223 (7%) participants had received three vaccine doses by the date of their latest sampling. In IMID patients, age and sex-adjusted estimated marginal mean antibody levels waned after week 16 and were substantially reduced at all time points compared to the controls, fnally dropping to the borderline range (1.01, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.19) at week 40 (Figure 1A, Table 1). A third dose was given to 128 (7%) of IMID patients with a poor response to 2 vaccine doses after a median 20 weeks of the second dose (IQR 10 to 26 weeks). After the third dose, antibody levels in IMID patients were comparable to those of healthy controls at 40 weeks who had three vaccine doses. These were also higher than that of IMID patients and controls who did not receive a third dose (Figure 1B). Conclusion: Humoral response to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was weaker in IMID patients compared to controls at all time points after the frst vaccine dose and practically disappeared after 1 year. IMID patients can still achieve a good antibody response with a third dose even after a weak response with two doses.
ABSTRACT
A 44-year-old man had persistent fever following a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Because of progressive sinus tachycardia, thyroid hormones were measured which showed hyperthyroidism. Thyroid sonography revealed enlargement of the thyroid gland with hypoechoic areas with blurred margins. We diagnosed subacute granulomatous thyroiditis associated with SARS-CoV2 infection and initiated therapy with prednisolone. This therapy resulted in rapid improvement of the patient's clinical condition and complete remission after three months.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fever of Unknown Origin , Thyroiditis, Subacute , Adult , COVID-19/complications , Fever of Unknown Origin/complications , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2 , Thyroiditis, Subacute/complicationsABSTRACT
Introduction: Treatment with convalescent plasma has been shown to be safe in COVID-19 infection, however, there remain conflicting results regarding its efficacy in immunocompetent patients. Nevertheless, neutralizing antibodies are a key requisite in the fight against viral infections. Patients depleted of antibody producing B-cells such as those treated with rituximab e.g. for hematological malignancies lack a fundamental part of their adaptive immunity. Therefore, treatment with convalescent plasma might still be of benefit in this particularly vulnerable cohort. Methods: Peripheral blood samples were taken from three COVID-19 patients, who were B cell-depleted after previous rituximab treatment, during the course of treatment with convalescent plasma. Flow cytometric analysis of activation markers with or without prior in vitro stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antigen revealed antigen-specific T cell responses. Serum levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG and IgM antibodies were measured by automated CLIA. RT-PCR was used to monitor viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs. Results: All three patients made a full recovery from infection following convalescent treatment, even though serum antibody levels decline rapidly after each plasma administration. The recovery coincided with an increase in SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood. Conclusions: We demonstrate efficacy of treatment with convalescent plasma in three patients unable to mount an antibody response by themselves and for the first time show that although application of convalescent plasma only leads to short-lived detectable systemic antibody levels, it appears to boost long-lasting specific T-cell responses.
ABSTRACT
The current coronavirus pandemic is an ongoing global health crisis due to COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Although COVID-19 leads to little or mild flu-like symptoms in the majority of affected patients, the disease may cause severe, frequently lethal complications such as progressive pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and organ failure driven by hyperinflammation and a cytokine storm syndrome. This situation causes various major challenges for gastroenterology. In the context of IBD, several key questions arise. For instance, it is an important question to understand whether patients with IBD (eg, due to intestinal ACE2 expression) might be particularly susceptible to COVID-19 and the cytokine release syndrome associated with lung injury and fatal outcomes. Another highly relevant question is how to deal with immunosuppression and immunomodulation during the current pandemic in patients with IBD and whether immunosuppression affects the progress of COVID-19. Here, the current understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19 is reviewed with special reference to immune cell activation. Moreover, the potential implications of these new insights for immunomodulation and biological therapy in IBD are discussed.
ABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV2) outbreak is the most dramatic event since World War II. Originating as a cluster of unexplained cases of pneumonia, it turned out that this viral disease termed COVID-19 is not only a respiratory infection, but a systemic disease associated with a number of extrapulmonary complications. One of the medical disciplines that is strongly affected by this viral infection is gastroenterology. COVID-19 causes in some patients typical symptoms of enteritis such as diarrhea or abdominal pain. There is also evidence that this infection may lead to liver and pancreatic injury. Since the SARS-CoV2 virus was detected in stool, a fecal-oral route of transmission is possible. Moreover, viral receptor angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is highly expressed in the gastrointestinal tract and enables the invasion of the gastrointestinal epithelium as demonstrated in vitro and in vivo. COVID-19 pandemic has an impact on the daily practice and the workflows in endoscopy leading to a dramatic decrease of screening and surveillance procedures. COVID-19 impacts the therapy of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly those using high doses of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive agents and biologics. Patients with preexisting liver disease, especially metabolic associated liver fatty disease (MALFD) with fibrosis or liver cirrhosis, are at high risk for severe COVID-19. As long as no active vaccine against SARS-CoV2 is available, gastroenterologists have to be aware of these problems that affect their daily routine practice.